Kris Bledowski, Director of economic studies at the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation notes:
"The
answer depends on how “stability” is defined. In political terms, one
could see some instability creep in or deepen in countries where oil
plays a disproportionately large fiscal role.
Yet this
impact would be felt locally rather than globally, andmostly in
countries with already-weak polities. Venezuela, Nigeria, or parts of
the Middle East come to mind. It’s less likely that potential conflicts
could spill over outside domestic or localtheaters.
The
economic impact has already been felt the world over. In the United
States, mining activity has depressed industrial output, while in Canada
the entire economy plunged into recession in 2015 as a result of
sharply lower oil prices.
At the same time, income
losses are being at least partly offset by gains on the consumer end.
Shifts in relative prices of major inputs or outputs occur all the
time,and the world economy is resilient enough to absorb them. Overall,
oil and its derivatives make up a small and declining share of unit
energy costs.
If global investment flows are more
unpredictable, currencies more volatile, and changes in income more
pronounced, other factors should be taken into account as well. Among
them are differences in monetary policies (in the United States and the
EU), private debt levels (in Brazil and China), and economic governance
(in Russia and Saudi Arabia).
Ian Bremmer, President and founder of Eurasia Group says:
"Did
Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms kill Soviet stability? No. They hastened
the melting of frozen instability. That’s the impact of cheap oil on the
Middle East, in particular the Sunni Arab petrostates and the
governments that rely on their largesse.
There’s
already little domestic legitimacy keeping these regimes in place. The
United States has little desire toact as the region’s policeman, and
nobody else is going to pick up the baton.
Communication technologies allow disenchanted young men to more easily mobilize.
And
there are scant few social, economic, and political reform efforts
among the governments themselves; security solutions don’t address the
underlying problems. Cheap oil makes those conflicts grow sharper. And
faster."
Jan Cienski, Energy and security editor at POLITICO says:
"No,
cheap oil won’t kill global stability—infact, it will bolster it. That
doesn’t mean low oil prices aren’t terrible news for a host of countries
like Russia, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Angola, and other emerging
markets that have built their budgets on oil exports. But as their
revenues shrink, their largely autocratic rulers will have to focus more
on keeping their people from rebelling over budget cuts and less on
causing trouble abroad.
No, cheap oil won’t kill global
stability—in fact, it will bolster it. That doesn’t mean low oil prices
aren’t terrible news for a host of countries like Russia, Saudi Arabia,
Venezuela, Angola, and other emerging markets that have built their
budgets on oil exports.
But as their revenues shrink,
their largely autocratic rulers will have to focus more on keeping their
people from rebelling over budget cuts and less on causing trouble
abroad."
Deborah Gordon, Director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program notes:
"mighty global omnipotence is often attributed to oil. But it’s unclear
whether low (or high) oil prices themselves can be squarely blamed for
growing global instability. Increasing oil market volatility, however,
could prove to be a stronger destabilizing force.
If
oil prices continue to swing wildly back and forth in the years ahead,
this could confound economic, technological, and geopolitical
fundamentals."
Note EU-Digest: Wall Street and
the financial Industry seem to be the only ones who are saying that
lower oil prices will contribute to Global Economic and Political
Instability , mainly because it hurts their energy investments and
market portfolio's . The drop in oil prices, however, has been very
beneficial to consumers and the the economy in general.
EU-Digest