USA: Corporate Insurance Policies suck |
Free education is something that is widely encountered across the globe, although college isn’t always included on the list. Many countries offer a number of free university seats while others subsidize them.
Many argue that this type of education,
just like universal healthcare, isn’t actually free since it is funded
by the government, who in turn gathers the cash by taxing people’s
paychecks and businesses.
Basically
that is an argument used in the US which in reality does not fly,
because the end result in countries which do provide this service is
offering everyone
access to what they need, be it education that will provide them with a
better future without having to spend half of their lives paying back
the student loans or getting the healthcare they need.
Many European (EU) countries regard free education also as an investment to the economy. There is skilled workforce available on the free labor market. The opposite solution could be for example that every industry would educate their own work force starting from day one.
Capitalism or socialism doesn’t define who must pay the education: the society, the industry or the individual.
It’s the same with the healthcare: there isn’t any rule that tells that either the society, the employer or the individual should be the one who pays for the health care. It could be also so that every industry should build their own hospitals and educate their own doctors - or so that the people, the work force, do it together. But it can also be regarded as a state’s investment in the economy so that the free work force remains available and capable on the market.
These
investments by the state are comparable with other investments in the
infrastructure and the functionality of the society. The state offers
some base for the free economy to thrive, like roads, security and so
on.
Socialism
is so abused and so
polymorphic concept that it’s hard to define simply. But in the basic
concept of socialism is about how the economic power is divided
between the capital and the labor.
It certainly has nothing to do with communism, which unfortunately many right-wing conservatives like to call socialism.
It certainly has nothing to do with communism, which unfortunately many right-wing conservatives like to call socialism.
.
The ultimate goal is a society that has stopped the domination of capital over the labor and where the labor has taken the domination on the production. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the state should own everything.
The ultimate goal is a society that has stopped the domination of capital over the labor and where the labor has taken the domination on the production. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the state should own everything.
Both of these functions can also be shared in different ways as long as it benefits the citizens and the country as a whole.
In
America the concept has become totally lopsided over the years. Today
about 3 % of the US population controls all the wealth in the country,
with corporations basically influencing all the decision making
processes of the political establishment.