Economic reality is beginning to catch up with the false hopes of many
Britons. One year ago, when a slim majority voted for the United
Kingdom’s
withdrawal from the European Union,
they believed the promises of the popular press, and of the politicians
who backed the Leave campaign, that Brexit would not reduce their
living standards. Indeed, in the year since, they have managed to maintain those standards by running up household debt.
This worked for a while, because the increase in household consumption
stimulated the economy. But the moment of truth for the UK economy is
fast approaching. As the latest figures published by the Bank of
England show, wage growth in Britain is not keeping up with inflation,
so
real incomes have begun to fall.
As this trend continues in the coming months, households will soon
realize that their living standards are falling, and they will have to
adjust their spending habits. To make matters worse, they will also
realize that they have become over-indebted and will have to deleverage,
thus further reducing the household consumption that has sustained the
economy.
Moreover, the BoE has made the same mistake as the average household: it
underestimated the impact of inflation and will now be catching up by
raising interest rates in a pro-cyclical manner. These higher rates will
make household debt even harder to pay off.
The British are fast approaching the tipping point that characterizes
all unsustainable economic trends. I refer to such a tipping point as
“reflexivity” – when both cause and effect shape each other.
Economic reality is reinforced by political reality. The fact is that
Brexit is a lose-lose proposition, harmful both to Britain and the EU.
The Brexit referendum cannot be undone, but people can change their
minds.
The primary cause of May’s defeat was her fatal misstep in proposing
that elderly people pay for a substantial portion of their social care
out of their own resources, usually the value of the homes that they
have lived in all of their lives. This “dementia tax,” as it became
widely known, deeply offended the core constituency, the elderly, of
May’s Conservative Party. Many either did not vote, or supported other
parties.
By approaching the negotiations that which started on June 19 in a
conciliatory spirit, May could reach an understanding with the EU on the
agenda and agree to continue as a member of the single market for a
period long enough to carry out all the legal work that will be needed.
This would be a great relief to the EU, because it would postpone the
evil day when Britain’s absence would create an enormous hole in the
EU’s budget. That would be a win-win arrangement.
If May embraces such a platform, she could then carry on leading a
minority government, because nobody else would want to take her place.
Brexit would still take at least five years to complete, during which
time new elections would take place. If all went well, the two parties
might want to remarry even before they have divorced.
Read more: Brexit In Reverse? by George Soros - Project Syndicate